“Labeling Russian culture is wrong” – Lithuania’s new culture minister
Source: LRT
In a bid to move away from blanket bans for Russian artists, Lithuania’s incoming Minister of Culture, Šarūnas Birutis, said his Baltic country needs more nuanced approach to Russian culture and its representatives.
“We understand that the Russian people are not the Kremlin. For millennia, they have been our neighbors and likely will remain so. Many people of Russian descent live in Lithuania as citizens, and most are loyal to Lithuania as their homeland. It is entirely wrong and inappropriate to stigmatize their nationality or culture,” said Birutis in an interview with LRT.
The minister argued for a balanced approach to Russian artists and musicians who plan to perform in Lithuania:
“Artists are different. Many have emigrated, and some openly oppose the Kremlin’s regime. It’s important to distinguish between those loyal to the regime and those resisting it. They are also part of Russian culture and should not all be painted with the same brush.”
His views appear to be at odds with earlier proposals by outgoing Minister Simonas Kairys, who called for a “mental quarantine” on Russian art in solidarity with Ukraine. In December 2023, Lithuania’s Seimas Cultural Committeeeven proposed a commission to screen Russian artists to identify pro-Putin affiliations. However, the government rejected the idea.
In 2025, the deadliest year yet for civilians, Ukraine’s three largest charitable foundations raised a record 105.9 billion hryvnias. It is more than the years 2022–2024 combined. According to the UN, humanitarian aid in Ukraine was delivered by more than 450 organisations, reaching five million people over the course of the year. Civic foundations hold licences to purchase lethal weapons, which is a function states have monopolised for centuries. These record sums were underwritten by international government grants, which means foreign states now channel billions directly through Ukrainian civic funds, bypassing inter-state channels. It is hard to imagine a stronger institutional trust in civil society.
During the GLOBSEC Defence Forum 2026 in Prague, representatives of “Steel Front”, an initiative by Rinat Akhmetov, discussed with NATO delegations, military officials, and representatives of the European defense industry the lessons learned from Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine.
After the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine witnessed an unprecedented wave of private support for the army. Citizens, big businesses, charitable foundations, and international philanthropists began financing the country’s defense alongside state assistance provided by international partners. Estimates of total private contributions range from tens to hundreds of billions of hryvnias. However, determining the exact amount remains difficult. In many cases, companies combine military aid, humanitarian programs, tax payments, social spending, and employee support in their reporting.
Rinat Akhmetov’s military initiative, “Steel Front”, has delivered a batch of drones worth UAH 214 million to the 1st “Azov” Corps of the National Guard of Ukraine. This shipment is part of the Metinvest Group’s ongoing support for the unit in 2025.
On October 6, the Administrative Cassation Court within the Supreme Court of Ukraine continued hearing case No. 990/80/25, in which the fifth President and leader of the party “European Solidarity”, Petro Poroshenko, seeks to have Presidential Decree No. 81/2025 from February 12, 2025 — enacting sanctions by the decision of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) — declared illegal and annulled. The plaintiff claims the document was falsified and that the sanctions are a tool of political persecution of the opposition, contrary to international norms. Government representatives deny the allegations and insist their actions were lawful. Journalists of Bukvy were present at the hearing.