Executions of Ukrainian POWs “enabled” and “endorsed” by Russian commanders – reports
Source: ISW
An alarming increase in Russian forces executing Ukrainian POWs has drawn attention of military experts after
nine Ukrainian POWS were killed near the village of Zelenyi Shliakh in the Kursk region on October 10, according to a recent assessment by analysts from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).
The Ukrainian project “Deepstate” reported on the killing of 9 troops on October 13. According to the report, Ukrainian drone operators encountered Russian troops in what they likely believed to be their rear zone and came under Russian fire. With limited ammunition, they had no choice but to surrender, and they were subsequently taken prisoner. Evidence suggests that the Russian troops disarmed, lined up, stripped, and executed the Ukrainian POWs.
This incident is part of a broader pattern of increasing executions across various combat zones as Russian commanders are likely to writ large condoning, encouraging, or directly ordering the execution of Ukrainian POWs.
The ISW continues to monitor videos and reports of Ukrainian POW executions and identifies a growing trend of Russian abuses. These acts appear to be tolerated, if not explicitly approved, by certain Russian commanders.
Analysts also noted that many Russian military bloggers have largely cheered on the executions, with some justifying and even celebrating the killings as they claimed that “the executions were deserved or that such executions are a common aspect of war,” said the report.
In my previous column, I wrote about social innovations in Ukraine. Those innovations are part of civic resilience and the democratization of security, which Europe is paying close attention to right now. The EU is trying to work out how to spread responsibility for its own security across society as a whole, rather than leaving it to institutions alone. It is looking for concrete ways to bring ordinary people into the work of defense and resistance.
Petro Poroshenko’s lawyers have appealed to the High Anti-Corruption Court demanding that NABU be obligated to register proceedings regarding the fact of exerting influence on the court and to recognize Petro Poroshenko as a victim in the case of the Deputy Head of the Office of the President, Iryna Mudra, due to her pressure on Supreme Court judges who were considering a lawsuit to overturn sanctions.
Internationally recognized brands and financial institutions should direct capital to Ukraine now, not waiting for the hostilities to end. This was emphasized by Rinat Akhmetov, president of FC Shakhtar, during a working visit to UEFA headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, where he met with UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin.
In recent days, Moscow’s official rhetoric has been dominated by hysteria over the decision of…
In 2025, the deadliest year yet for civilians, Ukraine’s three largest charitable foundations raised a record 105.9 billion hryvnias. It is more than the years 2022–2024 combined. According to the UN, humanitarian aid in Ukraine was delivered by more than 450 organisations, reaching five million people over the course of the year. Civic foundations hold licences to purchase lethal weapons, which is a function states have monopolised for centuries. These record sums were underwritten by international government grants, which means foreign states now channel billions directly through Ukrainian civic funds, bypassing inter-state channels. It is hard to imagine a stronger institutional trust in civil society.