State property fund’s report slammed over ‘lack of specifics’- Accounting Chamber report
Source: Ukraine’s Accounting Chamber
Ukraine’s State Property Fund’s 2023 has come under scrutiny after Accounting Chamber audit found it has “incomplete” information about the value of state assets, war-related losses, property under disputed privatization contracts, and assets involved in legal battles.
The Accounting Chamber inspection argues the report is as it left out ‘significant volumes of crucial information’ as it followed very vague ‘guidelines’.
“The data on the value of state assets is incomplete, making it impossible to identify track down revenue sources for the budget,” stated Gennadiy Plis of Accounting Chamber.
“Transparent privatization of state property” and “implement policies regarding state assets’ were initially viewed as the main tasks for the agency in 2023- 2025, but the numbers are dismal.
Projected privatization revenues for 2023 were set at 6 billion hryvnas, but the state got only 3.1 billion hryvnas after the “large-scale privatization” stalled.
State property rental income climbed past targets by 5.3%, helping the budget get extra 769 million hryvnas but the huge part of it -about 742 million hryvnas- were not paid due to exemptions.
The fund also did a poor job of mananging sanctioned or forcibly seized Russian assets.
In 2025, the deadliest year yet for civilians, Ukraine’s three largest charitable foundations raised a record 105.9 billion hryvnias. It is more than the years 2022–2024 combined. According to the UN, humanitarian aid in Ukraine was delivered by more than 450 organisations, reaching five million people over the course of the year. Civic foundations hold licences to purchase lethal weapons, which is a function states have monopolised for centuries. These record sums were underwritten by international government grants, which means foreign states now channel billions directly through Ukrainian civic funds, bypassing inter-state channels. It is hard to imagine a stronger institutional trust in civil society.
During the GLOBSEC Defence Forum 2026 in Prague, representatives of “Steel Front”, an initiative by Rinat Akhmetov, discussed with NATO delegations, military officials, and representatives of the European defense industry the lessons learned from Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine.
After the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine witnessed an unprecedented wave of private support for the army. Citizens, big businesses, charitable foundations, and international philanthropists began financing the country’s defense alongside state assistance provided by international partners. Estimates of total private contributions range from tens to hundreds of billions of hryvnias. However, determining the exact amount remains difficult. In many cases, companies combine military aid, humanitarian programs, tax payments, social spending, and employee support in their reporting.
Rinat Akhmetov’s military initiative, “Steel Front”, has delivered a batch of drones worth UAH 214 million to the 1st “Azov” Corps of the National Guard of Ukraine. This shipment is part of the Metinvest Group’s ongoing support for the unit in 2025.
On October 6, the Administrative Cassation Court within the Supreme Court of Ukraine continued hearing case No. 990/80/25, in which the fifth President and leader of the party “European Solidarity”, Petro Poroshenko, seeks to have Presidential Decree No. 81/2025 from February 12, 2025 — enacting sanctions by the decision of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) — declared illegal and annulled. The plaintiff claims the document was falsified and that the sanctions are a tool of political persecution of the opposition, contrary to international norms. Government representatives deny the allegations and insist their actions were lawful. Journalists of Bukvy were present at the hearing.