Two Ukrenergo advisors resign amid allegations of political pressure
Source: Yaroslav Zheleznyak, Ukrenergo
Ukrenergo senior advisors Daniel Dobbeni and Peder Andreasen said they are resigning from them positions in protest to the dismissal of the company’s CEO Volodymyr Kurdrytskyi, which they described as a “politically motivated decision”.
In a joint statement released on Tuesday, Dobbeni and Andreasen condemned the decision to remove Kudrytskyi claiming it had no ‘valid grounds’ and was driven by political interference rather than any failure in management. “We felt political pressure and observed constant attempts to bypass the competition to appoint people whose professional qualities were doubtful to the Management Board of the Company,” said the resigning advisors in their joint statement.
Dobbeni and Andreasen joined the board in December 2021 and were instrumental in guiding the Ukrenergo through the process of disconnecting from Russian and Belarusian power grids and integrating into the European network.
According to MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak, the fallout following their resignations can harm the company’s international partnerships, particularly with major creditors and donors like the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), who have previously cautioned against such destabilizing actions.
Zheleznyak wrote, “This marks the collapse of the entire Supervisory Board, which must have a majority of independent members. The move jeopardizes corporate governance standards and could strain relations with all donors”.
The situation unraveled after Ukrenergo Supervisory Board dismissed Kudrytskyi on September 2. The vote saw three state-appointed members and one independent member voting in favor of his removal, while Dobbeni and Andersen opposed the decision. Kudrytskyi will remain in his position until September 4 whne inte board member Oleksiy Brecht step in as an interim CEO.
“This decision completes the construction of a corrupt pyramid within Ukrenergo, but the reaction from international partners will be swift and painful,” Zheleznyak warned.
In 2025, the deadliest year yet for civilians, Ukraine’s three largest charitable foundations raised a record 105.9 billion hryvnias. It is more than the years 2022–2024 combined. According to the UN, humanitarian aid in Ukraine was delivered by more than 450 organisations, reaching five million people over the course of the year. Civic foundations hold licences to purchase lethal weapons, which is a function states have monopolised for centuries. These record sums were underwritten by international government grants, which means foreign states now channel billions directly through Ukrainian civic funds, bypassing inter-state channels. It is hard to imagine a stronger institutional trust in civil society.
During the GLOBSEC Defence Forum 2026 in Prague, representatives of “Steel Front”, an initiative by Rinat Akhmetov, discussed with NATO delegations, military officials, and representatives of the European defense industry the lessons learned from Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine.
After the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine witnessed an unprecedented wave of private support for the army. Citizens, big businesses, charitable foundations, and international philanthropists began financing the country’s defense alongside state assistance provided by international partners. Estimates of total private contributions range from tens to hundreds of billions of hryvnias. However, determining the exact amount remains difficult. In many cases, companies combine military aid, humanitarian programs, tax payments, social spending, and employee support in their reporting.
Rinat Akhmetov’s military initiative, “Steel Front”, has delivered a batch of drones worth UAH 214 million to the 1st “Azov” Corps of the National Guard of Ukraine. This shipment is part of the Metinvest Group’s ongoing support for the unit in 2025.
On October 6, the Administrative Cassation Court within the Supreme Court of Ukraine continued hearing case No. 990/80/25, in which the fifth President and leader of the party “European Solidarity”, Petro Poroshenko, seeks to have Presidential Decree No. 81/2025 from February 12, 2025 — enacting sanctions by the decision of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) — declared illegal and annulled. The plaintiff claims the document was falsified and that the sanctions are a tool of political persecution of the opposition, contrary to international norms. Government representatives deny the allegations and insist their actions were lawful. Journalists of Bukvy were present at the hearing.