Ukrainian officials respond to abuse and hazing scandal in 211th brigade
Source: Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine’s General Staff
Recent revelations about alleged abuse in Ukraine’s 211th Pontoon Bridge Brigade received a swift reaction from the country’s human righths ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets.
In a statement issued on Monday, Lubinets said he reached out to the General Staff and the Military Law Enforcement Service, urging an immediate investigation.
“I won’t stand by while such disgraceful behavior occurs! I’m taking this situation under my personal control,” he declared, promising updates on the investigation’s progress.
The controversy erupted after Ukrainska Pravda released a whistleblowe story of former psychological support officer Tymofiy Ostafiychuk who accused the commanders of the 211th Brigade of extorting money from soldiers, using threats, physical violence, and intimidation tactics.
Later in the day, the General Staff confirmed that it launched a probe into the claims adding they suspended the unit commander from duty for the time of investigation.
The General Staff admitted similar incidents had been investigated in September. The fresh allegations include the claims of:
- Beatings: Soldiers who refused to pay alleged “fines” faced brutal physical punishment.
- Crucifixion-like Torture: Some were reportedly tied to wooden crosses.
- “The Cage”: A chilling makeshift prison used to detain soldiers and extort funds.
Adding fuel to the fire, Ukrainska Pravda alleged that the abuse campaign was led by Vladyslav Pastukh, the son of the brigade’s chief of staff and godson of its commander. Following public outrage, Pastukh was reportedly transferred to another unit, and his father compensated some of the victims.
In my previous column, I wrote about social innovations in Ukraine. Those innovations are part of civic resilience and the democratization of security, which Europe is paying close attention to right now. The EU is trying to work out how to spread responsibility for its own security across society as a whole, rather than leaving it to institutions alone. It is looking for concrete ways to bring ordinary people into the work of defense and resistance.
Petro Poroshenko’s lawyers have appealed to the High Anti-Corruption Court demanding that NABU be obligated to register proceedings regarding the fact of exerting influence on the court and to recognize Petro Poroshenko as a victim in the case of the Deputy Head of the Office of the President, Iryna Mudra, due to her pressure on Supreme Court judges who were considering a lawsuit to overturn sanctions.
Internationally recognized brands and financial institutions should direct capital to Ukraine now, not waiting for the hostilities to end. This was emphasized by Rinat Akhmetov, president of FC Shakhtar, during a working visit to UEFA headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, where he met with UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin.
In recent days, Moscow’s official rhetoric has been dominated by hysteria over the decision of…
In 2025, the deadliest year yet for civilians, Ukraine’s three largest charitable foundations raised a record 105.9 billion hryvnias. It is more than the years 2022–2024 combined. According to the UN, humanitarian aid in Ukraine was delivered by more than 450 organisations, reaching five million people over the course of the year. Civic foundations hold licences to purchase lethal weapons, which is a function states have monopolised for centuries. These record sums were underwritten by international government grants, which means foreign states now channel billions directly through Ukrainian civic funds, bypassing inter-state channels. It is hard to imagine a stronger institutional trust in civil society.