President’s office silent on costs of Yermak’s U.S. trip, violating access to information

Source: Bukvy

On December 8, 2024, Bukvy submitted an official inquiry to the Office of the President of Ukraine, requesting details about the costs of Andriy Yermak’s recent visit to the United States.

President Zelensky’s top aide accompanied a Ukrainian delegation led by Minister of Economy Yuliia Svyrydenko during a December 4 trip, which saw the Ukrainian officials holding meetings with representatives of Donald Trump’s team, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, and bipartisan members of the Senate and Congress.

In its request, Bukvy sought clarification on the following points:

  • Was a presidential fleet aircraft used for Yermak’s visit? If so, which one?
  • Did the delegation’s aircraft land at a U.S. military airbase?
  • Which cities did the delegation visit?
  • Where and for how long did the delegation stay in the U.S.?
  • How much was spent on organizing and conducting the trip?

Under Ukraine’s Access to Public Information law, public authorities are obligated to respond to such requests within five working days. However, as of the evening of December 16, the President’s Office was tight-lipped failing to provide any response or addressing the questions raised.

Failure to reply requests like this violates Ukrainian law and may result in administrative penalties. Article 212-3 of Ukraine’s Code of Administrative Offenses stipulates fines ranging from 25 to 50 non-taxable minimum incomes for such violations.

In 2025, the deadliest year yet for civilians, Ukraine’s three largest charitable foundations raised a record 105.9 billion hryvnias. It is more than the years 2022–2024 combined. According to the UN, humanitarian aid in Ukraine was delivered by more than 450 organisations, reaching five million people over the course of the year. Civic foundations hold licences to purchase lethal weapons, which is a function states have monopolised for centuries. These record sums were underwritten by international government grants, which means foreign states now channel billions directly through Ukrainian civic funds, bypassing inter-state channels. It is hard to imagine a stronger institutional trust in civil society.

During the GLOBSEC Defence Forum 2026 in Prague, representatives of “Steel Front”, an initiative by Rinat Akhmetov, discussed with NATO delegations, military officials, and representatives of the European defense industry the lessons learned from Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine.

After the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine witnessed an unprecedented wave of private support for the army. Citizens, big businesses, charitable foundations, and international philanthropists began financing the country’s defense alongside state assistance provided by international partners. Estimates of total private contributions range from tens to hundreds of billions of hryvnias. However, determining the exact amount remains difficult. In many cases, companies combine military aid, humanitarian programs, tax payments, social spending, and employee support in their reporting.

Rinat Akhmetov’s military initiative, “Steel Front”, has delivered a batch of drones worth UAH 214 million to the 1st “Azov” Corps of the National Guard of Ukraine. This shipment is part of the Metinvest Group’s ongoing support for the unit in 2025.

On October 6, the Administrative Cassation Court within the Supreme Court of Ukraine continued hearing case No. 990/80/25, in which the fifth President and leader of the party “European Solidarity”, Petro Poroshenko, seeks to have Presidential Decree No. 81/2025 from February 12, 2025 — enacting sanctions by the decision of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) — declared illegal and annulled. The plaintiff claims the document was falsified and that the sanctions are a tool of political persecution of the opposition, contrary to international norms. Government representatives deny the allegations and insist their actions were lawful. Journalists of Bukvy were present at the hearing.