Proposed law may grant police wide access to bank accounts of Ukrainians
Source: The Center for Legislative Research of Ukraine
The Ukrainian parliament is set to review Bill No. 11043 that can toughen oversight of banking transactions of Ukrainians as officials look for ways to tackle schemes using peer-to-peer (P2P) payments for tax evasion.
According to the National Bank of Ukraine, shadow transactions are estimated to reach a staggering 200 billion hryvnias annually. Initially, lawmakers proposed strict limits on transfers, capping them at 100,000 hryvnias per month with a maximum of 30 transactions. The strong public reaction made officials add some tweaks to Bill No. 11043 that was seen as part of the solution. The proposed law will introduce a limit of 150,000 hryvnias with no cap on the number of transfers for six months, during which more effective solutions were to be devised.
As is often the case, legislators have embedded provisions that raises many eyebrows as law enforcement may soon acquire sensitive data—including geolocation, IP addresses, and the identities of individuals involved in transactions—without substantial justification.
The proposed amendments to Article 31 of Ukraine’s “On Payment Services” law would obligate financial service providers to furnish police with details of payment transactions, which will include:
- Geolocation data
- IP addresses
- Device information used for transactions
- Application data where payments were made
- Personal identification details (including names and ID codes)
- Payment service provider information
- Unique identifiers for both payers and payment devices
This trove of information is currently protected under banking secrecy laws but, if the law is made effective, police could request this data within 24 hours for any payment operation flagged as potentially criminal.
Critics are questioning the vague terminology in the legislation. For example, what exactly constitutes a “transaction indicating signs of criminal activity”? Who will determine if a transaction meets these criteria? The bill fails to clarify these issues, avoiding standard legal procedures for evidence collection in criminal cases.
Should this legislation pass, police could bypass standard protocols, gaining access to personal transaction data for any individual or company without the safeguards typically required. This raises significant privacy breach issues, as there are no clear safeguards to prevent misuse of the data obtained.
There are also fears that these expansive powers could lead to abuse and a further erosion of trust in law enforcement. The Ukrainian Constitutional Court has previously ruled that any restrictions on constitutional rights must be fair and proportionate. Critics argue that the current iteration of Bill No. 11043 fails to meet these principles.
What’s Next? As the bill approaches its final review, many are urging lawmakers to reconsider the balance between combating financial crime and protecting citizens’ rights. .
After the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine witnessed an unprecedented wave of private support for the army. Citizens, big businesses, charitable foundations, and international philanthropists began financing the country’s defense alongside state assistance provided by international partners. Estimates of total private contributions range from tens to hundreds of billions of hryvnias. However, determining the exact amount remains difficult. In many cases, companies combine military aid, humanitarian programs, tax payments, social spending, and employee support in their reporting.
Rinat Akhmetov’s military initiative, “Steel Front”, has delivered a batch of drones worth UAH 214 million to the 1st “Azov” Corps of the National Guard of Ukraine. This shipment is part of the Metinvest Group’s ongoing support for the unit in 2025.
On October 6, the Administrative Cassation Court within the Supreme Court of Ukraine continued hearing case No. 990/80/25, in which the fifth President and leader of the party “European Solidarity”, Petro Poroshenko, seeks to have Presidential Decree No. 81/2025 from February 12, 2025 — enacting sanctions by the decision of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) — declared illegal and annulled. The plaintiff claims the document was falsified and that the sanctions are a tool of political persecution of the opposition, contrary to international norms. Government representatives deny the allegations and insist their actions were lawful. Journalists of Bukvy were present at the hearing.
Rinat Akhmetov’s Metinvest Group has completed the construction of an upgraded underground NATO Role 2 hospital in one of the hottest sectors of the frontline. This is the second stabilization point established under the Steel Front initiative in cooperation with the Medical Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The new facility, funded by Metinvest with an investment of UAH 21 million, is more secure than the first one thanks to its deeper location underground (over 6 meters) and additional fortifications.
Five armored vehicles “Kozak” have received a new mission – thanks to the support of Metinvest, they have been upgraded to full-fledged command and staff vehicles. These upgraded vehicles are now operating on the front line.