State found overpaying 600 million for drones- reports
Source: Hromadske
The bombshell findings by Hromadske show that Ukraine’s government allegedly overpaid at least 593 million hryvnias on the state contracts that provided the Ukrainian army with Autel EVO MAX 4T drones through the “Army of Drones” project.
The Krion-M company that earlier dealt in furniture reportedly sold drones to the Ukrainian government at inflated prices, double the market rate, ranging from 360,000 to nearly 500,000 hryvnias whiles similar drones were procured through Prytula Foundation for 212,000 hryvnias a piece.
“Krion-M” has sold around 3,900 drones to the state for approximately 1.5 billion hryvnias. The drones were procured through Poland’s UMO and Germany’s Danator companies owned by Ukrainian former official Serhiy Velichuk. He argued the higher pricing by claiming the drones had “special software,” although experts later found no proof for that.
The shade procurement can raise many uncomfortable questions for the Ministry of Digital Transformation and the State Special Communications Service. Digital Transformation Minister Mykhailo Fedorov admitted poor oversight in 2023, though insisted his ministry red-flagged the situation and referred findings to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) while Yuriy Shchyhol, who led the State Special Communications Service at the time, now denies involvement.
NABU has launched a criminal investigation, though no charges have been filed to date.
In my previous column, I wrote about social innovations in Ukraine. Those innovations are part of civic resilience and the democratization of security, which Europe is paying close attention to right now. The EU is trying to work out how to spread responsibility for its own security across society as a whole, rather than leaving it to institutions alone. It is looking for concrete ways to bring ordinary people into the work of defense and resistance.
Petro Poroshenko’s lawyers have appealed to the High Anti-Corruption Court demanding that NABU be obligated to register proceedings regarding the fact of exerting influence on the court and to recognize Petro Poroshenko as a victim in the case of the Deputy Head of the Office of the President, Iryna Mudra, due to her pressure on Supreme Court judges who were considering a lawsuit to overturn sanctions.
Internationally recognized brands and financial institutions should direct capital to Ukraine now, not waiting for the hostilities to end. This was emphasized by Rinat Akhmetov, president of FC Shakhtar, during a working visit to UEFA headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, where he met with UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin.
In recent days, Moscow’s official rhetoric has been dominated by hysteria over the decision of…
In 2025, the deadliest year yet for civilians, Ukraine’s three largest charitable foundations raised a record 105.9 billion hryvnias. It is more than the years 2022–2024 combined. According to the UN, humanitarian aid in Ukraine was delivered by more than 450 organisations, reaching five million people over the course of the year. Civic foundations hold licences to purchase lethal weapons, which is a function states have monopolised for centuries. These record sums were underwritten by international government grants, which means foreign states now channel billions directly through Ukrainian civic funds, bypassing inter-state channels. It is hard to imagine a stronger institutional trust in civil society.